"there was no attorney-client relationship with Counterclaimant, no contract existed for representation of Counterclaimant, and Counterdefendant had not committed to the representation of Counterclaimant. "
Source
http://ia601205.us.archive.org/2/items/gov.uscourts.nvd.91330/gov.uscourts.nvd.91330.220.0.pdf
(Page 3)
So if there was "no attorney-client relationship" then on what authority did Marc Randazza of Randazza Legal Group act in telling Eugene Volokh that a settlement was best for Cox, that he would "bow out", or offer a co-counseling relationship?
If there was "no attorney-client relationship" then on what authority did Marc Randazza of Randazza Legal Group negotiate a "settlement" with opposing counsel that he decided was in my best interest?
If there was "no attorney-client relationship" then on what authority did Marc Randazza of Randazza Legal Group tell other First Amendment Attorneys that he represented me, and pretty much had it handled, so they would not contact me to represent me?
If there was "no attorney-client relationship" then on what authority did Marc Randazza of Randazza Legal Group take it upon himself to try and reword a court opinion or something action to change my ruling in a way that would benefit his present and future clients, mostly in the Porn Industry?
If there was "no attorney-client relationship" then on what authority did Marc Randazza of Randazza Legal Group tell Eugene Volokh that he indeed was my attorney in this matter, then offer that possibly Eugene Volokh could co-counsel?
So Randazza says he was not my attorney and had "no attorney-client relationship" yet he made all these actions, discussions, offers, negotiations on "my behalf", REALLY? And that is not a violation of law or constitutional rights in any way?
So CLEARLY Marc Randazza of Randazza Legal Group did represent me, Crystal Cox.
Then after this REPRESENTATION when I fired him for lying, being a pompass ass, violating my constitutional rights, berating me, talking a deal behind my back, lying about what I wanted the outcome to be and other reasons then he used his legal knowledge, my proprietary information, my legal strategy, my private information and information he gained through representation; to defame me, harass me, bully me, intimidate me, ruin my quality of life and he used his media connections to accuse me of crimes in which I had no adjudication or due process on in any way and simply ruined my life, attacked me, violated my privacy rights, harassed and violated the rights of my sources, sued me and my sources, and engaged in conspiracy with a large amount of legal bloggers, lawyers, investigators, online media, NPR, Forbes, and even Judges.
After this Clear REPRESENTATION, Marc Randazza sued my sources that were reporting on him such as Monica Foster aKa Alexandra Mayers and Desi Foxx aKa Diana Grandmason, he violated there and my privacy rights along with Inventor Eliot Bernstein. Randazza got my phone records, travel information, bank information, home address, names and contacts of customers and clients, information on all my domain names and intellectual property, information on my church mission, wire information, personal private information and contacts and put this in the public domain in legal cases and media to further harass and attack me. All this and he was MY ATTORNEY.
He even bullied, harassed and threatened my friends, clients, ex's, customers, church, insiders, sources and others to get information about me and put fear and intimidation into them.
More on this Topic of Did Marc Randazza Represent Crystal Cox as her attorney or NOT?
http://investigativeblogger.blogspot.com/2014/12/marc-randazza-again-admits-to-have-been.html
Full Docket
http://ia601205.us.archive.org/2/items/gov.uscourts.nvd.91330/gov.uscourts.nvd.91330.docket.html
No comments:
Post a Comment